vBulletin 4 Gold Review: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

December 23, 2009 | In: News and Information

I have one site running the new vBulletin Gold Suite. The site was closed so I decided it would be a perfect test bed. It had a few users and a few posts before I closed it down. I opened it back up and upgraded the old database to vBulletin 4. If you want to check out the site before you finish reading you can find it at http://serverhelpforum.com.

The install on of vBulletin 4 Gold went well. The vBulletin CMS part did give me an out of memory error. More on that later. Once we got past that everything looked good and seemed to work well. Read on to get to the good, the bad and the ugly.

The Good:

The install of vBulletin 4 Gold went smooth except for the out of memory error while the vBulletin CMS was being installed. That was fixed by upping the memory in php.ini from 128M to 256M. The server has 8Gigs installed so it had much more to allocate if needed. After the install I promoted a few posts in the resources section to articles. This went well. I added a couple extra forums and did a few test posts. All is still good. Everything seemed to work and work well. Then it was time to get into the nuts and bolts of  vBulletin 4 and here comes the bad.

The Bad:

I turned the forum into debug mode. What a shock when I saw the vBulletin CMS main page used 202 queries. I refreshed the page so the cache would kick in. Query count was now 197. Refreshed again count went back to 202. I removed one column. No change. I cut the amount of articles to show. Query count down to 187. Refresh the page back to 202. I removed the widgets. No change. Refresh the page down to 178. Add one widget. Back up to 200. I don’t know what is causing this. I do know if it is left like this the vBulletin CMS will be useless unless it is installed on a dedicated server.

I then went about changing the style of the forum. I downloaded the docs that were posted on vBulletins site. I created a new style and went to work on it. I change the background and save changes. Nothing happens. I change a few more things. Nothing happens. Everything is still default. I head over to vBulletin’s site. In the bugs and suggestions forum there is a number of posts with the same problems as me. It seems the stylevar editor does not work as it should. A member who saw my post sent me a PM telling me how to work around the issue. Thanks much for that if you happen to read this.

The Ugly:

Well lets start with the out of memory error. There is no way that upgrading to vBulletin 4 Suite on a small site should throw up out of memory errors. This is unacceptable. If you try to install this on a VPS you’re basically screwed unless you host is willing to up the allocated memory for php.

Now on to the sitemaps a core new feature that was touted throughout the discussions at vBulletin. They do not work. Sure they are created fine. Submit one to Google and you’ll see that they throw an error in webmaster tools. The error says that the sitemap file is empty. Rebuild it, resubmit it and the error returns shortly after Google redownloads it.

The stylewar editor should work without any work arounds. This was another highly touted feature of vBulletin 4. It does not work out of the box.

Search engine friendly URLs another feature that is supposed to make vBulletin 4 the best. Sure they work just try finding the docs that explain how to use the .htaccess method. You won’t because, surprise, vBulletin 4 was released without any docs. You have to visit vBulletin’s site and look in the vBulletin 4 Beta forum to find your answer.

That brings me the last ugly part. In the admincp the help files for these new features don’t exist. Don’t believe me? Go into the vBulletin 4 admincp, open the stylevar editor, pick any stylevar and select the help icon. You get an empty page.

How Internet Brands can release vBulletin 4 as gold is beyond me. They broke just about every unwritten rule that developers follow. The beta process was a joke. I was a supporter of the process when it was first announced. Closed betas to select testers always works better than open betas if the beta is done correctly. The vBulletin 4 beta was a mess.

Then they release vBuletin 4 Gold without help files or updated docs. vBulletin 4 as it stands now is at best beta quality. It should have never been released as gold. A visit to the vBulletin 4 forums at vBulletin’s site will tell you that.



8 Responses to vBulletin 4 Gold Review: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Avatar

Brandon Sheley

December 23rd, 2009 at 11:44 pm

Great write-up AWS!
I just setup a small test site as well but hadn’t made it to checking out the query count on the cms or forum. I had read discussion at the .Com but hadn’t had time to check it out myself. I wonder why it’s using so many didn’t vbadvanced use less than 20 and people complained about that.
As I always say, I hope for the best, but a reasonable product is still months away.

Avatar

AWS

December 23rd, 2009 at 11:56 pm

I think the problem is the co-mingling of new code and old. If you look at the source you see a distinct difference in the cms code compared to the forum code. My bet is the query problem on the cms will remain until the total rewrite is complete.

A side note. My posts from the last few days have been removed at vbulletin.com. I guess I was hit by the censor monster.

Avatar

Mike

December 24th, 2009 at 6:59 am

Removed your posts, eh?

And people want to know reasons for switching to IPB?

Avatar

David McHenry

December 29th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

The censor monster is just getting started over there, if you thought the bannings were bad before when they released the plans for new licensing structure, wait for a little longer as this vBulletin 4 travesty continues, and Internet Brands starts to fall on it’s face because of it.

Avatar

AWS

December 29th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

There might not be anyone left to ban. The customers that have been there through this fiasco are slowly leaving. They will get some new dollars for a while. That will dry up pretty fast as word of mouth changes even more than it has already. Sad to see this happen to a once great product.

Avatar

vbplusme

January 1st, 2010 at 2:37 pm

Amazing! I finally found some people who realize that the latest and greatest Jelsoft/Internet Brands are clueless about a real development and release process. I knew that they were screwed when they kept saying they would go gold on 12/21/2009. They skipped a beta cycle completely and released ‘their’ Gold on the date. I had the stuff before the official announcement so by the time they actually made the official announcement, I knew that the release was missing release notes and version specific documentation, like the v4 manual which STILL doesn’t exist. On top of that, a lot of stuff didn’t work as has been described here.

I did some code comparisons between the “Forum” and the “Suite” and its clear that the CMS and Blog, like v3 are band-aid add-on features so I can not surprised that the performance has gone to hell. I run sites on a shared server so you can bet that I won’t be upgrading anytime soon as I have no plan to upgrade to a dedicated server.

The Forum code and folder structure and the Suite code structure are identical except for the added CMS and Blog file and folder in the Suite package. If I removed all the files / folder that contained “CMS” or “Blog” from the Suite installation, it would be identical to the Forum installed code. That should tell you something about the flawed development process. To me, this clearly indicates that they don’t have a development process, are flying by the seat of their pants and are totally data driven which means that quality doesn’t matter.

I totally agree that its a sad thing to see this formerly great product get flushed like this. I am astonished that they made these changes to the architecture so that the new stuff was incompatible with the existing v3 code base and nobody there thought that was a problem?

Avatar

rares

April 8th, 2010 at 3:33 am

Hello,

Can you tell me what’s the status of vbulletin 4 publishing suite ? Did they fix any bugs ? I’m running with 3.6.2 on a shared server. does it worth it to upgrade if i dont want to chage de hosting plan ?

thanks

Avatar

AWS

April 10th, 2010 at 11:25 pm

Fixed some and introduced more with the fixes.

Comment Form

Login



Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest Tweets

Users Online

Users: 4 Guests, 1 Bot

Advertisement

Calendar

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Recent Trackbacks

Twitter Friends

pauldotcom
kohliconsulting
GKonMicrosoft
idiot_girl
thinkgeek
mashable
cst_thefixer
BigRichB
grader
FordMNX_UK
p_schwarz
JayVig
fab4peace
arstechnica
TheDigitalLife
TweetStats
TweetSmarter
BradHoward
kamper
TUAW
radtech
kkwak
MariSmith
IE
InformIT
justbsus
AzhriaLilu
BridgetMarieS
wetalknetwork
MidoMazinger
TransverseStyle
vBulletinTeam
Friends: 130 Followers: 203