<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Schwarz Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobschwarz.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobschwarz.com</link>
	<description>My Network of Sites and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by AWS</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>AWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-57</guid>
		<description>They didn&#039;t. It was business as usual for them. Of course we changed all our help files that were vbulletin specific to reflect the changes in IPB. Other than that I truly don&#039;t think many noticed or if they did it didn&#039;t matter to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They didn&#8217;t. It was business as usual for them. Of course we changed all our help files that were vbulletin specific to reflect the changes in IPB. Other than that I truly don&#8217;t think many noticed or if they did it didn&#8217;t matter to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by Bob</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-56</guid>
		<description>How did your users react?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did your users react?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by AWS</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>AWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really know. I can&#039;t explain why it went up that high. I do know that it had steadily been increasing. I attributed that to the fact I was getting traffic to search terms totally unrelated to the content of the site and people would leave right away.  The bounce rate on that site has been higher than it used to be. At one time it was below 40% with the lowest at 32%. I am getting ready to do an update with more stats that I gathered. I do believe bounce rate is down in the mid 40&#039;s now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really know. I can&#8217;t explain why it went up that high. I do know that it had steadily been increasing. I attributed that to the fact I was getting traffic to search terms totally unrelated to the content of the site and people would leave right away.  The bounce rate on that site has been higher than it used to be. At one time it was below 40% with the lowest at 32%. I am getting ready to do an update with more stats that I gathered. I do believe bounce rate is down in the mid 40&#8217;s now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by Paul</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Why did the bounce rate go up significantly after switching to IPB? I notice in both graphics that this is the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the bounce rate go up significantly after switching to IPB? I notice in both graphics that this is the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by Anthony</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Have you considered that it may be due to annual traffic cycles ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered that it may be due to annual traffic cycles ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Combating vBulletin Forum Post and PM Spam by Lisa</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/combatting-vbulletin-forum-post-and-pm-spam/comment-page-1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=23#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Is there any way I can do this but allow a registered member to PM admins ONLY?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way I can do this but allow a registered member to PM admins ONLY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by AWS</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>AWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I have no reason to do anything like that although I will be starting 2 new sites. One with IPB and one with vbulletin so I might track and compare stats on the 2. 

The only reason I did this was to see if there would be a drop in traffic because of the switch. On the contrary the site visits and pageviews increased and continue to increase.

I&#039;ll be updating this with more stats in a couple more weeks. What I am seeing now is telling me that vbseo might actually have been hurting the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no reason to do anything like that although I will be starting 2 new sites. One with IPB and one with vbulletin so I might track and compare stats on the 2. </p>
<p>The only reason I did this was to see if there would be a drop in traffic because of the switch. On the contrary the site visits and pageviews increased and continue to increase.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be updating this with more stats in a couple more weeks. What I am seeing now is telling me that vbseo might actually have been hurting the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum SEO: vBulletin/vbSEO vs IPB with SEO URL&#8217;S by cheat-master30</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/forum-seo-vbulletinvbseo-vs-ipb-with-seo-urls/comment-page-1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>cheat-master30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=189#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Interesting experiment, and I guess I&#039;m glad to see people who switch to Invision aren&#039;t screwed over SEO wise.  But wouldn&#039;t it also be interesting to test these things as well:

1. Whether the vB SEO or Invision default setup is better for a brand new site which hasn&#039;t been indexed already by Google?

2. And to compare the vBulletin default setup to the Invision default setup SEO results wise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting experiment, and I guess I&#8217;m glad to see people who switch to Invision aren&#8217;t screwed over SEO wise.  But wouldn&#8217;t it also be interesting to test these things as well:</p>
<p>1. Whether the vB SEO or Invision default setup is better for a brand new site which hasn&#8217;t been indexed already by Google?</p>
<p>2. And to compare the vBulletin default setup to the Invision default setup SEO results wise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Combating vBulletin Forum Post and PM Spam by Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/combatting-vbulletin-forum-post-and-pm-spam/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=23#comment-48</guid>
		<description>@AWS - Thanks a lot of that last explanation. I had already considered this now when my PM spam has increased, but was afraid I&#039;d have to move over thousands of users manually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AWS &#8211; Thanks a lot of that last explanation. I had already considered this now when my PM spam has increased, but was afraid I&#8217;d have to move over thousands of users manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Increase PHP Performance on Windows Servers by Cache for a Windows Server? - vBulletin SEO Forums</title>
		<link>http://bobschwarz.com/how-to-increase-php-performance-on-windows-servers/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Cache for a Windows Server? - vBulletin SEO Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobschwarz.com/?p=172#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] increase is tremendous. If you want to check out my blog post about the performance increase here is the link.  Memcached does nothing to help performance unless you are using more than one memcached server.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increase is tremendous. If you want to check out my blog post about the performance increase here is the link.  Memcached does nothing to help performance unless you are using more than one memcached server.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
